Sunday, September 05, 2010
Articles

TOPSweb Articles

If you are a customer of TOPSweb, LLC web services (Domains and Hosting) you have likely just received an email to the effect that your provider has now changed to another provider, Domains Pricied Right. 

 After a lot of deliberation I have decided to drop the hosting and domain portion of the business as it is an extremely competitive marketplace and the effort expended these days to acquire new customers is not worth the pay out, putting it very simply. 

You will still receive the exact same great service you received with TOPSweb as other than the name, the services are the same.

To my past customers, thank you so much for your support.

Last week Google announced that it will discontinue development of Wave as a standalone product and that the website could be shut down by the end of the year.
Google Wave was touted to be the application that would completely replace email as we know it today.  But it was much more than that.  As opposed to having an email thread of replies back and forth and having to keep contextual filing of these emails and attachments over a subject matter, Wave offered something simpler.  Google coined the term 'Wave' for its product in which photos, videos, maps, IM conversations, voice recordings, emails, all could revolve around a wave (as opposed to a thread).  So collaboration was much richer and easier and could happen very much live as you went.
googlewave
One of the cool features I liked was that you could literally see what the other person typed as they typed it.  Not only that, if they typed in another language it could translate almost on the fly right before your eyes.  It was truly an amazing tool that unfortunately did not catch on.
So why did it not catch on?  Speaking for myself, it always seemed like it was in a state of extreme beta.  I kept waiting for it to truly roll out.  I'd check the site from time to time to see who was on there, and not many joined up.  Honestly, Google didn't market it well.  There was no real need to leave your email behind for this new technology as it really was more of a new toy than a benefit.  I never understood why they couldn't port gmail into it.  In other words, why couldn't I go to Wave and check my gmail, then if someone had Wave, then great, if they didn't, well that's fine too.  Then Wave would have promoted itself with the added benefit of features.  Instead I'm sure as many of you found that had an account it sort of got lost in my bookmarks...those gajillions of  bookmarks that I'll get to later.
All this said I'm sure technology developed here will not go wasted.  Google will still continue to push for having online web applications to replace desktop applications as the central need with its Web-based Chrome OS.  Google is doing an amazing job of bringing real time collaboration and and very rich office applications right there in the browser which can be used on any computer on the Internet.  Or should I really say any device on the Net.
So long Wave, here's a long wave goodbye.

Last week Google announced that it will discontinue development of Wave as a standalone product and that the website could be shut down by the end of the year. 
Google Wave was touted to be the application that would completely replace email as we know it today.  But it was much more than that.  As opposed to having an email thread of replies back and forth and having to keep contextual filing of these emails and attachments over a subject matter, Wave offered something simpler.  Google coined the term 'Wave' for its product in which photos, videos, maps, IM conversations, voice recordings, emails, all could revolve around a wave (as opposed to a thread).  So collaboration was much richer and easier and could happen very much live as you went.   


One of the cool features I liked was that you could literally see what the other person typed as they typed it.  Not only that, if they typed in another language it could translate almost on the fly right before your eyes.  It was truly an amazing tool that unfortunately did not catch on.
So why did it not catch on?  Speaking for myself, it always seemed like it was in a state of extreme beta.  I kept waiting for it to truly roll out.  I'd check the site from time to time to see who was on there, and not many joined up.  Honestly, Google didn't market it well.  There was no real need to leave your email behind for this new technology as it really was more of a new toy than a benefit.  I never understood why they couldn't port gmail into it.  In other words, why couldn't I go to Wave and check my gmail, then if someone had Wave, then great, if they didn't, well that's fine too.  Then Wave would have promoted itself with the added benefit of features.  Instead I'm sure as many of you found that had an account it sort of got lost in my bookmarks...those gajillions of  bookmarks that I'll get to later.


All this said I'm sure technology developed here will not go wasted.  Google will still continue to push for having online web applications to replace desktop applications as the central need with its Web-based Chrome OS.  Google is doing an amazing job of bringing real time collaboration and and very rich office applications right there in the browser which can be used on any computer on the Internet.  Or should I really say any device on the Net.
So long Wave, here's a long wave goodbye.

In the movies when you watch sequals, the 'part 3' typically outright stinks.  They become quite gratuitous offerings to take advantage of an existing fan base to gain mass quantities of revenue for the movie industry.  Examples:  Rocky III, Rambo III, Lethan Weapon III, Return of the Jedi, Police Accademy 3 and cubed.  You get the idea.  Thank goodness the world of web applications do not follow that same marketing druel.  Wordpress is about to release the third version of their blog framework.  The words brilliant, amanzing, awesome, blogolicious come to mind. 

Some of the best features being added are allowing WP to be more than just a simple blog and really compete with Content Management Frameworks like Drupal and Joomla.  Some exampless are:

  • Merging of Wordpress and Wordpress MU (Multiple User) - This allows you to network your blogs together through a single dashboard. 
  • Custom Post Types - This allows you to customize a page layout type.  Similar to Joomla's page types, you can set custom defined pages to have say additional pages for photos, a newspaper style layout, etc.  It puts more controls to the owner for additional content and control how that will get displayed.
  • Menu Management - I've never understood why other systems makes this complicated and WP gets it.  WP has very much simplified building menus with a slick drag and drop interface.  
  • Custom Taxonomies - Add customized ways to group info on your site further than just tags and categories.  Custom taxonomies allow you to add another level into that.  The best example on the web I could fine was Justin Tadlock's blog in an article called, "Using custom taxonimies to create a movie database."  Here he describes how using these taxonimies in a WP 2.8 blog you can use taxonimies to group data by genre, director, actor, etc.
  • Shortlinks with your own domain - This is specifically useful for microblogging your content on sites like Twitter.  Where before you might use a service tinyurl to condense the size of your link so you can stay under that 150 charachter limit on your tweet.  You post might look like this  http://tinurl.com/*&(YGHGE now you can use your own domain to keep your brand.  An exmple might be http://topsweb.com/?post=255.  This is one of those features that you have to ask once you see it, "Why has this not always been around?"  Simple but brilliant.
Wordpress had done a great job with this version and we will be offering it in the next month at our Web Services Center.   For those who enjoy the simplicity offered by Wordpress blogs but want a bit more power of a CMS such as Joomla, then WordPress 3.0 is the best solution for you.

skypeSkype has now released a new feature called group chat in their latest release of the their beta version.  For most, like myself, the statement that comes to mind is, "well it's about time."

I have to admit, I've only been using Skype for about a year now.  I've been using Gizmo5 project for a bit longer because of it's integration with Google Voice.  However, my parents got on with Skype and rather than try to make converts of them to another system, I went ahead and installed it on a windows machine.  I have to admit after using Skype video conferencing for a while for the kids to talk to the grandparents, I soon signed up for more features.  In fact it is my full time busines line because of it's price and high quality. In fact for some time I had used it to bridge a full blown daily conference call for about 6 people and it worked pretty well.  I've since added it to my most loved linux laptop.  For linux Skype has been perpetually in beta but works very well but with not too many features.

So now while we converse through video chat with my parents, we will now be able to add other relatives to the mix via video.  This feature at the time being is free, but after it is fully released it will be with an additional charge. 

The one thing I did not find is the ability to do a screen share to mutiple users.  Another feature that would seem simple enough to provide with the technology that Skype has.  Currently you can very easily do this one on one but not with multiple users such as that of dimdim.com.  Certainly a feature worth adding on to their portfolio.

The beta version video chat does have clear video and good sound quality.  It is not available yet for MAC and Linux users but is currently reported to be under development for both. 

Flash news instead of News Flash - get it..steve-jobs

Steve Jobs wrote a public letter recently called Thoughts on Flash, where he announces that Apple devices such as the iPad, iPod, iTouch, iDunno everything they make will no longer support Adobe Flash.  For some this is a real shocker as Apple has held approximately 20% investment into Adobe's portfolio.  Adobe products have continuously been married to the Apple product line.  Finally, Steve Jobs has announced what most of us (all linux users) already know, Adobe Flash sucks!

I do remember the first time I saw a website done in Adobe Flash.  It had motion, it was graphically the most beautiful thing on the web I had ever seen to that point.  It was litterally an image of a tree with birds moving around it and alternating text.  I'll never forget the words I said half out loud as I looked at this site, "This is the future of web design right here."  {I'm right now sort of half way laughing to myself..no at myself.}  I proceeded to purchase every book available I could on find on Flash, I bought Macromedia (maker at the time) Flash software and went to work.  After about a couple of weeks I thought, this takes too long...ughhh.

The fact is, it was the future of web design for at least a couple of years.  It became so popular so fast that it became annoying.  It seemed like every major corporation website you went to you had to either watch a commercial before you could enter the website to see content or as most of us quickly learned exactly where the "Skip intro" link was to completely ignore a beautiful piece of work that a programmer probably slaved over for months.  Click = shut up.

The letter from Steve Jobs outlines the reasons for Apple's departure for using Adobe Flash as the future of the web will greatly rely on mobile devices and Adobe Flash just doesn't run well on mobile devices.  It drains battery life, it was designed for interaction with a mouse and not with use of touch screens.  From a development standpoint Flash is closed source and proprietary and they require developers to use Adobe Flash development tools.  Jobs sees this as a liability for Apple requiring development to a limited source library makes for substandard apps. 

Apple instead will embrace the new HTML5 standards which is more open for all systems and browsers on any device and browser and is very media content friendly. 

This is a bold move for Apple in my book.  Apple is often seen as having too much control over functionality of its devices, yet by doing so they've managed to have a very high control over the quality and performance of their products.  No other computer manufacturer can compare.  So it pleases me a great deal that Apple recognizes the need for open yet structured standards for web browsers.  These new standards are built with accessibility and usablity in mind, making them not only cross-platform but cross-device as well.  A website that rocks on your PC will also rock on your Android device (did I really say that), or your iPhone.

 

More Articles...

Page 1 of 6

Start
Prev
1

Find Us on Facebook

Facebook Image